Should Developing Countries Concentrate on Improving?

Should training countries concentrate on upward(a) industrial skills or should they promote education first? As everyone knows that a government represents the concourse to operate the whole kingdom and to structure a well-organized schema for education, on the other hand, a powerful nation needs a vehement administrative government which could constitute beneficial policies for the people, because government is closely machine-accessible with people, and its relationship is unbreakable. So, any policies government made are important directly influencing peoples life.Useful policies provide a nation right teaching to economic aid its schooling in any fields such as economy, education, industry and military in contrast, bad ones pull the whole nation down. Simply it can be said, constitution of policies makes the decision of national development, and in particular its much more(prenominal) important in developing countries than progress countries. Then, in developing pr ocedure which one should be developed first, improving industrial skills or promoting education? In my opinion, promoting education is basically more important than industrial skills improvement.One of reasons is it can non be doubted that industrial development or improvement is based on technology development which requires specialists, specially advanced technologies, which developing countries could not independently develop, need to be import though high-educated people, therefore, even if a nation has abundant mines or materials, without well-structured and far-flung education development, the resources surely can not be well use to develop technologies. And, oppositely, low-educated people slow down development.Another reason is well-structured education system means frequencies of transmission and communication of diversified and different information. It not hardly helps education to be popularized, but also enhances the possibility of acquirement from advanced countrie s. Moreover, a nation has a well-developed financial system must be set up by education. When people are learned from knowledge, wherefore they know how to trade with others, or countries, in many ways. Hence, education pushes sub of trade and also strengthens the entity of nation. An example can be supportive for my view.In the yesteryear more than 50 years, dickens political systems, democracy and communism, were developed and makes two most powerful and superior countries, America and grey Russia. It is known that aged Russia was an industrial country, and the isolation made it develop its own technologies. For maintaining advantageous rig which in competition with America, it continually kept developing, but why Old Russia collapsed in a flash but Communist China did not? The opening of it economic market to international may be the answer, but another important policy was also valued by Chinese government is the enhancement of literacy rate increasing.Chinese government knew the technology development or technology import both require education, for this reason the nationwide vulgarisation of education was strongly pushed to educate and train up people to help both restructuring and development in every field. To sum up, I conceive the establishment of education is much more important than technology development or improvement. Even though a nation can develop its technologies first, without the reinforcement of education its development of every field, will be short stopped or slowed down by its low-educated system.