Comte vs Spencer :: essays research papers

Auguste Compte and Herbert Spencer were devil of sociologys first great theorists. Both Compte and Spencer studied participation and the legion(predicate) ways in which people in society interact. Both theorists check up on on certain issues pertainning to society and social science, yet they completely discord on their views of the function of sociology.Spencer and Compte both realize that there is an order of co-existance in society. Society itself is made up of several components and parts which are topic to change and progress, thus altering society as a unit with these changes. With regards to the function of sociology, Compte believed that sociology was important due to the fact that it acted as a take to the woods for people in order to make a better society. Compte axiom evolution as very important and believed that every society went by dint of three stages. These admit the theological stage, the abstract stge and the positive stage. Spencer on the former(a) hand believed that sociology was necessary to demonstrate that people in society should non interfere with the natural processes. Spencers theories on evolution focused to a greater extent on a different set of three basic laws. These include the law of persistence of force, the law of the undestructibility of matter and the law of the continuity of motion. Compte apothegm society in two major categories, the first was theological (military) which looked at the power of religion spiritual leaders as well as priests and those with intellectual power. The second was scientific (industrial) where there was a moral intellectual power, which included scientists and thinkers. Spencer saw society in two ways as well. The first included the movement from a simplistic society ripening into a more complex one with various levels. The second was that society was changing from being more militant to industrial. Both Compte and Spencer seemed to share a common perspective on these particular view s of society. When reviewing Comptes methods, one sees that he focused primarily on empirical facts.